Correct option is D
The case of
Jayadayal Poddar v. Bibi Hazara (1974) is related to the concept of an
ostensible owner under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It discusses the rights of a transferee who has taken property from an ostensible owner, believing them to have full authority to transfer, provided certain conditions are met.
Information Booster
An ostensible owner is a person who appears to be the real owner but is not the true owner. If a transferee acts in good faith and has taken reasonable care, the transfer is protected.
Additional Knowledge
·
Doctrine of election: Refers to Section 35 of the Act.
·
Doctrine of part performance: Covered under Section 53A.
·
Transfer by an unauthorized person: Does not specifically relate to this case.
