In which of the following cases was it held that "The amount awarded under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance was adjustable against the alimony amount awarded in matrimonial proceedings under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and was not to be given over and above the same."?

Correct option is C

The correct answer is (c) Sudeep Chaudhary v. Radha Chaudhary. In the case of Sudeep Chaudhary v. Radha Chaudhary, the Supreme Court held that the maintenance amount awarded under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. can be adjusted against the amount awarded as alimony under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This judgment ensures that the wife does not receive double benefits for the same purpose, avoiding unjust enrichment.
Information Booster
Section 125 Cr.P.C. provides a mechanism for the maintenance of wives, children, and parents. Meanwhile, Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act provides for interim maintenance and expenses of the proceedings. The Supreme Court's decision harmonizes the reliefs under these two provisions to prevent overlapping benefits.
Additional Knowledge
· Satya v. Teja Singh: This case pertains to the recognition of foreign divorce decrees.
· Yamuna Bai v. Anant Rao: This case deals with the maintenance rights of a wife under Hindu law.
· Rewati Bai v. Jogeshwer: Not a recognized landmark case in the context of maintenance.