Correct option is B
The correct answer is (b). In the case of
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005), the Supreme Court of India held that at the time of framing charges or taking cognizance of the offense, the accused has no right to produce any material in defense. The Court only examines the materials placed by the prosecution to determine whether a prima facie case exists.
Information Booster:
The decision in this case clarifies the procedural aspect of criminal trials, ensuring that the focus remains on whether the prosecution’s case justifies the framing of charges.
Additional Knowledge:
·
(a):
Anil Rai v. State of Bihar deals with delay in pronouncement of judgment and related issues.
·
(c):
Bani Singh v. State of U.P. is related to the appellate powers of the High Court under Section 386 of Cr.P.C.
·
(d):
Pratap Singh v. State of Jharkhand primarily concerns juvenile justice and the determination of age.
