arrow
arrow
arrow
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that fundamental duties must be used as a tool to control State action drifting from Constitutional values?
Question

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that fundamental duties must be used as a tool to control State action drifting from Constitutional values?

A.

L.K. Koolwal Vs State of Rajasthan

B.

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India

C.

Sachidanand Pandey Vs State of West Bengal

D.

AllMS Students Union Vs AIIMS

Correct option is A


The case of L.K. Koolwal vs State of Rajasthan stressed that Fundamental Duties under Article 51A can be used to guide and control the actions of the State, ensuring adherence to constitutional values.
Information Booster:
In L.K. Koolwal, the Supreme Court emphasized that Fundamental Duties are binding not just on citizens but also guide State actions, helping prevent any drift from constitutional objectives.
Additional Information:
· Option (b): M.C. Mehta dealt with environmental issues, not fundamental duties.
· Option (c): Sachidanand Pandey was focused on environmental protection.
· Option (d): AIIMS Students Union was related to reservations, not fundamental duties.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow