arrow
arrow
arrow
In which case did the Supreme Court determine that under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a married daughter having sufficient, independ
Question

In which case did the Supreme Court determine that under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a married daughter having sufficient, independent and self means, is liable for the maintenance of her parents?

A.

Revati Bai v. Jageshwar

B.

Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashirao Rajaram

C.

Sudeep Chawdhary v. Radha Chawdhary

D.

Bhure v. Gomti Bai

Correct option is B

The correct answer is (b) Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashirao Rajaram.
Detailed Explanation:
1. Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.: This Section deals with the order for maintenance of wives, children, and parents. It provides a remedy for neglected persons who are unable to maintain themselves.
2. Case Background: In Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashirao Rajaram, the issue was whether a married daughter, having sufficient means, could be ordered to pay maintenance to her parents under Section 125.
3. Supreme Court Ruling: The Court held that the term "child" in Section 125 includes both sons and daughters. Hence, a married daughter having sufficient means is also liable to maintain her parents.
4. Legal Significance: This ruling emphasized that gender or marital status does not exempt a daughter from the obligation to maintain her parents if she has the means to do so.
5. Equality Principle: The judgment reinforces the principle of gender equality and ensures that the responsibility of maintaining parents is not unfairly placed only on sons.
6. Societal Impact: The judgment addresses the socio-economic realities where daughters, too, are financially independent and can support their parents.
Information Booster:
· Section 125 Cr.P.C.: A remedial provision aimed at providing speedy relief to individuals unable to maintain themselves.
· Maintenance: Includes provisions for food, clothing, residence, and medical attendance and treatment.
· Financial Independence: The emphasis is on the financial independence of the child, not their marital status.
Additional Information:
· Revati Bai v. Jageshwar: This case dealt with maintenance under personal laws and did not specifically address Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.
· Sudeep Chawdhary v. Radha Chawdhary: This case primarily focused on maintenance issues between spouses and did not involve the aspect of a married daughter's liability.
· Bhure v. Gomti Bai: This case concerned maintenance disputes under different circumstances and was not related to the specific issue of a married daughter's liability under Section 125.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow