arrow
arrow
arrow
In respect of which one of the following, has the Supreme Court of India recently overruled its earlier decisions?
Question

In respect of which one of the following, has the Supreme Court of India recently overruled its earlier decisions?

A.

Right to die

B.

Right of women to enter into Sabrimala Temple

C.

Freedom to have same sex relationships

D.

Triple talaq

Correct option is C

The correct option is (c) Freedom to have same sex relationships.

Explanation:

In the landmark case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India unanimously overruled its own 2013 judgment in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. NAZ Foundation.

  • In Suresh Koushal (2013): The Supreme Court had overturned a Delhi High Court ruling and reinstated Section 377 of the IPC, effectively re-criminalizing consensual same-sex acts. The court had argued that the LGBTQ+ community was a "minuscule minority" and it was up to Parliament to change the law.
  • In Navtej Singh Johar (2018): The Supreme Court corrected this, stating that the 2013 decision was "arbitrary" and "legally unsustainable." The court held that Section 377, in so far as it criminalized consensual sexual acts between adults in private, violated Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.

Information Booster:

  • Section 377 IPC: A colonial-era law that criminalized "unnatural offences," which included consensual same-sex relationships.
  • Constitutional Morality: In this judgment, the Court emphasized "Constitutional Morality" over "Social Morality," stating that the rights of a minority cannot be suppressed by the views of the majority.
  • Doctrine of Progressive Interpretation: The Court used this doctrine to explain that the Constitution is a "living document" and its interpretation must evolve with changing social values.

Additional Knowledge:

Option

Case Reference

Why it's often confused

(a) Right to die

Common Cause (2018)

This also involved an overruling (of Gian Kaur, 1996). However, Navtej Johar is a more frequent example of "correcting" a recent judicial error.

(b) Sabarimala Temple

Indian Young Lawyers Association (2018)

This was a fresh interpretation of the conflict between individual liberty (Article 25) and denominational rights (Article 26), rather than an overruling of a specific past SC case.

(d) Triple Talaq

Shayara Bano (2017)

The Court declared the practice "unconstitutional" because it was not an essential religious practice. It didn't overrule a prior SC judgment but rather set aside a long-standing personal law practice.

Free Tests

Free
Must Attempt
Video Solutions

RBI Assistant Pre 2026 Full Mock Test -01

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon100 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
  • timerIcon60 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt
Video Solutions

RBI Asst Prelims 2026 : Reasoning Section Test 01

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon35 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon35 Marks
  • timerIcon20 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

SBI CBO 2026 Full Mock Test- 02

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon120 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon120 Marks
  • timerIcon120 Mins
languageIcon English
test-prime-package

Access ‘UPSC CBI APP’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow