hamburger menu
All Coursesall course arrow
adda247
reward-icon
adda247
    arrow
    arrow
    arrow
    In respect of which one of the following, has the Supreme Court of India recently overruled its earlier decisions?
    Question

    In respect of which one of the following, has the Supreme Court of India recently overruled its earlier decisions?

    A.

    Right to die

    B.

    Right of women to enter into Sabrimala Temple

    C.

    Freedom to have same sex relationships

    D.

    Triple talaq

    Correct option is C

    The correct option is (c) Freedom to have same sex relationships.

    Explanation:

    In the landmark case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India unanimously overruled its own 2013 judgment in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. NAZ Foundation.

    • In Suresh Koushal (2013): The Supreme Court had overturned a Delhi High Court ruling and reinstated Section 377 of the IPC, effectively re-criminalizing consensual same-sex acts. The court had argued that the LGBTQ+ community was a "minuscule minority" and it was up to Parliament to change the law.
    • In Navtej Singh Johar (2018): The Supreme Court corrected this, stating that the 2013 decision was "arbitrary" and "legally unsustainable." The court held that Section 377, in so far as it criminalized consensual sexual acts between adults in private, violated Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.

    Information Booster:

    • Section 377 IPC: A colonial-era law that criminalized "unnatural offences," which included consensual same-sex relationships.
    • Constitutional Morality: In this judgment, the Court emphasized "Constitutional Morality" over "Social Morality," stating that the rights of a minority cannot be suppressed by the views of the majority.
    • Doctrine of Progressive Interpretation: The Court used this doctrine to explain that the Constitution is a "living document" and its interpretation must evolve with changing social values.

    Additional Knowledge:

    Option

    Case Reference

    Why it's often confused

    (a) Right to die

    Common Cause (2018)

    This also involved an overruling (of Gian Kaur, 1996). However, Navtej Johar is a more frequent example of "correcting" a recent judicial error.

    (b) Sabarimala Temple

    Indian Young Lawyers Association (2018)

    This was a fresh interpretation of the conflict between individual liberty (Article 25) and denominational rights (Article 26), rather than an overruling of a specific past SC case.

    (d) Triple Talaq

    Shayara Bano (2017)

    The Court declared the practice "unconstitutional" because it was not an essential religious practice. It didn't overrule a prior SC judgment but rather set aside a long-standing personal law practice.

    Free Tests

    Free
    Must Attempt

    RBI Asst Prelims 2026: Quant Advance level Test 01

    languageIcon English
    • pdpQsnIcon35 Questions
    • pdpsheetsIcon35 Marks
    • timerIcon20 Mins
    languageIcon English
    Free
    Must Attempt

    RBI Asst Prelims 2026: Reasoning Advance level Test 01

    languageIcon English
    • pdpQsnIcon35 Questions
    • pdpsheetsIcon35 Marks
    • timerIcon20 Mins
    languageIcon English
    Free
    Must Attempt
    Video Solutions

    RBI Grade B 2026 Phase 1 Full Mock Test 01

    languageIcon English
    • pdpQsnIcon200 Questions
    • pdpsheetsIcon200 Marks
    • timerIcon120 Mins
    languageIcon English
    test-prime-package

    Access ‘UPSC CBI APP’ Mock Tests with

    • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
    • Unlimited Re-Attempts
    • Personalised Report Card
    • 500% Refund on Final Selection
    • Largest Community
    students-icon
    383k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
    Our Plans
    Monthsup-arrow