arrow
arrow
arrow
In Indira Sawhney Vs Union of India case, the Supreme Court held that there:
Question

In Indira Sawhney Vs Union of India case, the Supreme Court held that there:

A.

can be reservations in promotions

B.

cannot be reservations in promotions

C.

can be reservations in promotion for Other Backward Castes (OBC)

D.

can be reservations in promotion for women

Correct option is B


In the Indira Sawhney vs Union of India (1992) case, also known as the Mandal Commission case, the Supreme Court held that while reservations can be provided in public employment, they cannot be extended to promotions.
Information Booster:
The Supreme Court clarified that reservations in promotions would affect administrative efficiency and, therefore, were not allowed. However, this was later modified for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) through constitutional amendments.
Additional Information:
· Option (a), (c), (d): The Indira Sawhney case explicitly excluded reservations in promotions for all categories, including OBCs and women.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow