Correct option is B
Hadley v. Baxendale is a famous English case on
damages for breach of contract. It established the rule that damages must be reasonably foreseeable and directly related to the breach.
Information Booster: This case set the precedent that damages are recoverable only if they were within the contemplation of both parties when the contract was made.
Additional Knowledge:
·
(a) Frustration of contract: Incorrect, as the case deals with damages.
·
(c) Discharge of contract: Incorrect, this is about breach and damages.
·
(d) Contract in restraint of trade: Incorrect, unrelated to this case.
