Given below are two statements:
Statement I: Inductive arguments can only be stronger or warker.
Statement II: Deductive arguments are either invalid or valid.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below.

Correct option is A

Statement I is correct because inductive arguments are evaluated based on their strength or weakness. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on observations or specific instances, and such arguments can vary in strength. The strength depends on the amount and quality of evidence supporting the conclusion.
Statement II is also correct because deductive arguments are evaluated in terms of validity and soundness. A deductive argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises; otherwise, it is invalid. Valid deductive arguments can also be sound if the premises are true, but soundness is an additional criterion beyond validity.
Information Booster:
Inductive Arguments: These arguments derive general principles from specific observations. They are probabilistic and can be stronger (more evidence) or weaker (less evidence).
Deductive Arguments: These arguments derive specific conclusions from general principles. They are either valid (logically consistent) or invalid (logically inconsistent).
Validity: A property of deductive arguments where the structure guarantees the conclusion if the premises are true.
Strength: A property of inductive arguments indicating how well the premises support the conclusion.