Given below are two statements, one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Poststructuralism is unthinkable without structuralism.
Reason (R): Poststructuralism continues structuralism's strongly humanist perspective and it closely follows structuralism in its belief that language is not the key to our understanding of ourselves and the world.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

Poststructuralism is indeed closely connected to structuralism in terms of historical development and intellectual context, but it does not continue structuralism's perspective, nor does it maintain a "strongly humanist" stance. Instead, poststructuralism represents a critical departure from structuralism. Here's a breakdown of the issues with the statement and reason:
1. Historical Context: It's true that poststructuralism emerged in the intellectual context of structuralism. Structuralism, which was influential in the mid-20th century, focused on the study of structures and systems, particularly in language and culture.
2. Divergence from Structuralism: Poststructuralism, however, is characterized by its critique of structuralist ideas. Poststructuralists questioned the idea that there are fixed, stable structures underlying language, culture, and society. They emphasized the instability of meaning, the role of power and language, and the absence of fixed truths.
3. Humanist Perspective: Poststructuralism is not strongly humanist. In fact, it often challenges humanism by decentring the human subject and emphasizing the role of discourse, power, and ideology. It's critical of the idea that language is transparent or that it directly reflects human consciousness.
4. Language and Understanding: While both structuralism and poststructuralism engage with language, they do so in different ways. Structuralism sees language as a system of signs and symbols with stable meanings. Poststructuralism, on the other hand, argues that language is contingent, context-dependent, and influenced by power dynamics.
So, in summary, poststructuralism does have historical ties to structuralism, but it represents a significant departure in terms of its philosophical and theoretical outlook. The reason provided in the question is not correct because it inaccurately portrays poststructuralism as a continuation of structuralism's perspective and as maintaining a strongly humanist stance, which it does not.