Consider the following statements:
1. Aurangzeb was no less foolish than James II of England, who lost three kingdoms for a mass
2. Like James II, Aurangzeb was adept at making friends.
3. Due to Aurangzeb's fanaticism, the Rajputs, the Mughals biggest supporters in India, became his allies.
How many of the statements given above are correct?

Correct option is A

The correct answer is (a) Only one
Explanation:
Statement 1 is correct. The historical assessment often links Aurangzeb's rigid religious and political policies, which led to widespread rebellion and the eventual decline of the Mughal Empire, with James II's inflexibility that led to the Glorious Revolution and his loss of the thrones of England, Scotland, and Ireland. 
Statement 2 is incorrect. Aurangzeb was known for his suspicion and policies that strained relationships with many groups including Marathas, Sikhs, and even his own officials, making him largely unsuccessful at making friends or alliances in the long run. James II also suffered from poor political judgment and alienated key supporters, leading to his downfall. 
Statement 3 is incorrect. Due to Aurangzeb's religious fanaticism, specifically the reimposition of the  jizya tax and interference in Rajput affairs, the  Rajputs became his adversaries and revolted against him, not his allies. The Rajputs had been vital supporters of the Mughal Empire since Akbar's reign. 
Information Booster:
The comparison between Aurangzeb and James II is a well-known historical analogy to illustrate how inflexible and religiously motivated policies can lead to political downfall.
Aurangzeb ruled for nearly 50 years, expanding the empire to its largest size, but his constant warfare drained the treasury and alienated non-Muslim populations. 
The Rajput rebellion against Aurangzeb significantly weakened the Mughal military and political structure, a major factor in the empire's decline after his death in 1707.