arrow
arrow
arrow
A distinction has been well explained by the Supreme Court in Nanakchand v. State of Punjab (A.I.R. 1955 SC 274) relating to which one of the followin
Question

A distinction has been well explained by the Supreme Court in Nanakchand v. State of Punjab (A.I.R. 1955 SC 274) relating to which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code?

A.

Between Section 378 and Section 383

B.

Between Section 361 and Section 362

C.

Between Section 350 and Section 380

D.

Between Section 34 and Section 149

Correct option is D

The Supreme Court in Nanakchand v. State of Punjab (A.I.R. 1955 SC 274) explained the distinction between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. These Sections deal with the concepts of common intention and common object, respectively.
Information Booster:
1. Section 34 IPC: Relates to acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention. It states that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.
2. Section 149 IPC: Deals with every member of an unlawful assembly guilty of an offense committed in prosecution of a common object.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow