arrow
arrow
arrow
Which one of the following is not a case relating to the doctrine of precedent?
Question

Which one of the following is not a case relating to the doctrine of precedent?

A.

Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

B.

Prakash Chand Pathak v. State of U.P.

C.

Liversidge v. Anderson

D.

Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar

Correct option is C

Liversidge v. Anderson is not related to the doctrine of precedent. It is an English case concerning the limits of executive power during wartime. The doctrine of precedent is primarily addressed in Indian cases like Sajjan Singh, Prakash Chand Pathak, and Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar.
Information Booster:
The doctrine of precedent, or stare decisis, requires courts to follow the legal principles established in previous decisions when similar facts arise in subsequent cases.
Additional Knowledge:
· Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan: Dealt with constitutional amendments.
· Prakash Chand Pathak v. State of U.P.: Involved criminal law and precedent.
· Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar: A landmark case on constitutional interpretation and federalism.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
368k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
368k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow