arrow
arrow
arrow
Which of the following statements about the Delhi High Court’s ruling on the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ in November 2024 is correct?
Question

Which of the following statements about the Delhi High Court’s ruling on the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ in November 2024 is correct?

A.

The judgement rejected the applicability of the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ in cases of acquittal or quashed criminal proceedings.

B.

The Court stated that the right to privacy cannot override public interest in matrimonial cases.

C.

The Court permitted the petitioner to approach online platforms and search engines to mask their identities.

D.

The Court ruled that the names of the couple involved in the matrimonial dispute must remain publicly accessible to ensure transparency.

Correct option is C

The correct answer is: (C) The Court permitted the petitioner to approach online platforms and search engines to mask their identities.

 Explanation:
  • In November 2024, the Delhi High Court upheld the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ (RTBF) in a matrimonial dispute case, allowing the petitioners to request masking of their identities.

  • The Court permitted individuals to approach online platforms and search engines (like Google, YouTube, etc.) to de-index or mask content that infringes on their right to privacy, especially when no overriding public interest is involved.

  • This ruling balanced the right to privacy with public interest and emphasized non-interference with court records.

 Information Booster:
  • The ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ stems from the Right to Privacy, a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution (as per the Puttaswamy judgment, 2017).

  • The Delhi HC clarified that masking identities online does not mean removal of court judgments from official sources like Indian Kanoon or court websites.

  • The Data Protection Act, 2023, also recognises RTBF as a limited right, especially in digital contexts.

  • The judgment distinguished between matrimonial cases and criminal offences, with a more privacy-protective approach for the former.

  • The Court acknowledged the risk of digital perpetuity of sensitive personal data, especially in acquittal and private dispute cases.

 Additional Knowledge:
  • Option A is incorrect because the Court did not reject RTBF in acquittal/quashed cases—prior courts have supported it in such instances.

  • Option B is incorrect because the Court upheld privacy over public interest in private matrimonial cases.

  • Option D is incorrect as the ruling explicitly allowed masking names to preserve privacy.

  • Other High Courts (e.g., Orissa HC, Karnataka HC) have also previously upheld RTBF, especially in cases where criminal records are quashed or reputational harm persists post-acquittal.

  • The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, further reinforces this right, allowing individuals to request removal or restriction of personal data under specific circumstances.

Free Tests

Free
Must Attempt

CBT-1 Full Mock Test 1

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon100 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
  • timerIcon90 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

RRB NTPC Graduate Level PYP (Held on 5 Jun 2025 S1)

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon100 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
  • timerIcon90 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

CBT-1 General Awareness Section Test 1

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon40 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon30 Marks
  • timerIcon25 Mins
languageIcon English

Similar Questions

test-prime-package

Access ‘RRB NTPC’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow