Correct option is A
Introduction:
In the context of social research, moral faults refer to unethical behaviors or traits that compromise the integrity, validity, and human rights involved in a study. Among the options provided (patience, purity, deceit, knowledge), the qualities of patience, purity, and knowledge are considered virtues or neutral professional requirements.
The element that is not considered a moral fault is patience (and similarly, purity and knowledge). Conversely, deceit is strictly considered a moral and ethical fault.
Information Booster:
To understand why certain traits are classified as virtues or faults in research, we look at the ethical guidelines that govern social scientists:
Deceit (The Moral Fault): Deceit involves deliberately misleading participants about the nature of the research, withholding information, or providing false data. It violates the principle of Informed Consent.
Patience (A Virtue): Social research often involves long-term observation, complex data collection, and slow human interactions. Patience is a necessary professional trait to ensure data is collected accurately without rushing or forcing results.
Knowledge (A Prerequisite): Possessing knowledge is the primary goal and requirement of research. It is neither a fault nor a virtue in the moral sense, but rather a professional competency.
Purity (Moral Integrity): In a research context, purity usually refers to the "purity of data" or the "purity of intention," meaning the researcher remains unbiased and uncorrupted by external pressures.
Additional Knowledge:
Ethical conduct in social research is primarily governed by several core principles designed to protect the "subjects" (human participants) and the "science" itself:
Integrity vs. Fabrication: A moral fault often discussed alongside deceit is fabrication (making up data) or falsification (altering data to fit a hypothesis).
The Principle of Non-Maleficence: This is the ethical obligation to "do no harm." Deceit can often lead to psychological harm or loss of trust in the scientific community.
The Belmont Report: This is a foundational document for ethical research. It outlines three key pillars: Respect for Persons (autonomy), Beneficence (minimizing harms/maximizing benefits), and Justice (fair distribution of research burdens).
Institutional Review Boards (IRB): Most social research must be approved by an IRB to ensure that moral faults like deceit are minimized and that the benefits of the study outweigh any potential ethical risks.