There is no distinction between de facto and de jure recognition for the purpose of giving effect to the internal acts of the recognised authority. This was held so in the case of:

Correct option is B

In Luther v. Sagor (1921), the English courts upheld the acts of a de facto government (the Bolsheviks in Russia) as valid because the UK had granted de jure recognition to the Soviet regime, demonstrating no distinction between de facto and de jure recognition.