The power of the Central Vigilance Commission to call for information does NOT extend to

Correct option is D

The correct answer is (d) call for any information to adjudicate over anti-corruption matters.

Explanation

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is primarily an advisory and supervisory body, not a judicial or adjudicatory one. While it has extensive powers to oversee vigilance administration, it lacks the power of "adjudication" (the legal power to make a formal judgment or decree in a legal case).

• (a), (b), and (c) are incorrect as they represent powers the CVC does have. Under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, the Commission is empowered to call for reports, returns, and statements from the Central Government and its departments to exercise general supervision over anti-corruption and vigilance work.
• Statement (d) is correct because the CVC cannot adjudicate. It can only recommend disciplinary action or suggest prosecution to the competent authority (the government). The actual "adjudication" or trial for corruption occurs in Special Courts (for criminal matters) or through the respective Disciplinary Authorities (for departmental matters).

Information Booster:

The CVC was established in 1964 based on the recommendations of the K. Santhanam Committee to address government corruption. It was given statutory status in 2003.

Key Limitations of CVC Powers:

• Advisory Nature: Its advice is not legally binding on the Central Government, though the government must provide reasons if it chooses to disagree with the CVC.
• No Investigative Wing: It does not have its own investigative staff (except for a small technical wing). It relies on the CBI or the Chief Vigilance Officers (CVOs) of various departments.
• No Prosecution Power: It cannot directly sanction the prosecution of a public servant; it can only recommend it.