hamburger menu
All Coursesall course arrow
adda247
reward-icon
adda247
    arrow
    arrow
    arrow
    The case of State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyay is concerned with
    Question

    The case of State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyay is concerned with

    A.

    Conspiracy

    B.

    Confession

    C.

    Estoppel

    D.

    Presumption

    Correct option is B

    The case of State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyay is a landmark judgment related to confessions made to police officers and their admissibility in Court.
    Information Booster This case clarified the law concerning confessions, especially in the context of confessions made to police officers. The Supreme Court ruled on the conditions under which such confessions might be admissible and the safeguards that must be in place to protect the rights of the accused.
    Additional Knowledge
    · Conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act.
    · Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents a party from arguing something contrary to a claim made or implied by their previous words or actions.
    · Presumption refers to a legal assumption that a fact is true until it is rebutted by evidence to the contrary.

    test-prime-package

    Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

    • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
    • Unlimited Re-Attempts
    • Personalised Report Card
    • 500% Refund on Final Selection
    • Largest Community
    students-icon
    353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
    test-prime-package

    Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

    • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
    • Unlimited Re-Attempts
    • Personalised Report Card
    • 500% Refund on Final Selection
    • Largest Community
    students-icon
    353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
    Our Plans
    Monthsup-arrow