arrow
arrow
arrow
The 'Carry forward' rule was held to be 'ultra vires' in the case of:
Question

The 'Carry forward' rule was held to be 'ultra vires' in the case of:

A.

Devdasan Vs Union of India

B.

B.N. Tiwari Vs State of Mysore

C.

State of Kerala Vs N.M. Thomas

D.

Balaji Vs State of Mysore

Correct option is A


In Devadasan v. Union of India (1964), the Supreme Court ruled that the 'carry forward' rule allowing unfilled reserved vacancies to be carried forward to the next year violated the Constitutional principle of equality under Article 16. The rule exceeded the 50% limit on reservations and was therefore declared unconstitutional.
Information Booster:
The Supreme Court, in Devadasan, held that the carry forward rule violated the 50% cap on reservations and disturbed the balance between reserved and general categories.
Additional Information:
· Option (b): B.N. Tiwari was concerned the seniority rule in employment and did not rule on the carry forward rule.
· Option (c): N.M. Thomas dealt with reservations in promotions, not the carry-forward rule.
· Option (d): Balaji v. State of Mysore was about reservations but not the specific issue of carrying forward vacancies.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow