Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Consider the information given in the statements as true, even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements.
Statement:
Class 9B students lost 14 out of 20 hockey matches, but won 8 out of 10 football matches played this year.
Conclusions:
I. Class 9 students like football more than hockey
II. Class 9 students should play football more than hockey

​Statement:
Class 9B students lost 14 out of 20 hockey matches, but won 8 out of 10 football matches played this year.
​Conclusions:
I. Class 9 students like football more than hockey - False

The statement gives information about the outcomes of the matches but says nothing about the students' preferences or liking for football or hockey.

Preferences cannot be inferred from success rates alone.
II. Class 9 students should play football more than hockey - Flase

While the statement indicates better performance in football, it does not necessarily imply they should play it more.

Factors like interest, school policies, or training focus are not mentioned in the statement.

So, Both conclusions is weak.

Thus, the correct answer is (c).

​