Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted on riots in that area has been fabricated based on prejudices and commission has not presented the whole event.
Conclusions:
I. Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigation.
II. The members of the commission should be severely punished.
II. The next commission should consist of inhabitants of that area only.

​Statement:
There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted on riots in that area has been fabricated based on prejudices and commission has not presented the whole event.

Analyze each conclusion

Conclusion I:
The statement mentions people's protest, but does not logically imply that another commission should be sent.
This conclusion does not follows.

Conclusion II:

There is no evidence or information in the statement to suggest that the members of the current commission should be punished.
The statement mentions a fabricated report, but it does not provide direct evidence of wrongdoing by the members.
This conclusion does not follow.

Conclusion III:
Suggesting that the next commission should consist only of inhabitants of that area is biased and not logical.
An impartial commission is necessary for a proper investigation, not a group solely from the affected area.
This conclusion does not follow.

So. None of the conclusions follow.

Thus, the correct option is: (d)