Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
Increasing use of non-biodegradable plastic will pose a grave threat to plant and animal life in the long run.
Conclusions:
1: If non-biodegradable plastic is banned, humanity will not face extinction.
2: Humanity will not be impacted by extensive use of plastic.

"Increasing use of non-biodegradable plastic will pose a grave threat to plant and animal life in the long run."

The statement only states that plastic pollution poses a grave threat to plant and animal life. It does not establish that banning plastic ensures humanity’s survival.

There could be other factors (like deforestation, climate change, diseases, wars, etc.) that may lead to extinction, even if plastic is banned.

The statement clearly says that plastic poses a grave threat to plant and animal life, which indirectly affects humanity too.

Since plastic pollution can harm ecosystems, food chains, and water sources, it can impact humans.

Thus, the correct option is (c) Neither 1 nor 2 follows.