Correct option is B
Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab (1952) is a landmark case that deals with the
admissibility of confessions in criminal proceedings. The case focused on the legal requirements for the admissibility of a confession and the principle that a confession must be voluntary and truthful in its entirety.
In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that
partial confessions cannot be accepted if they exclude incriminating portions and only include exculpatory statements. The Court emphasized that a confession must be accepted or rejected as a whole and should not be used selectively to convict an accused.
Information Booster
Key Points of Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab:
1.
Voluntary Confession: The confession must be made voluntarily and without coercion, inducement, or promise.
2.
Whole Truth Principle: A confession cannot be used selectively. It must either be accepted or rejected in its entirety. This means that courts cannot pick and choose parts of a confession that suit the prosecution's case while ignoring exculpatory parts.
3.
Misuse of Confession: In this case, the prosecution attempted to use only certain parts of the confession while disregarding other parts that exonerated the accused, which the Court deemed impermissible.
The decision in
Palvinder Kaur reinforced the principle that for a confession to be admissible, it must be complete, voluntary, and reliable.
Additional Knowledge
(a) Dying Declaration
A
dying declaration is a statement made by a person regarding the cause or circumstances of their death. This concept is covered under
Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act.
Palvinder Kaur does not deal with dying declarations.
(c) Relevancy of Judgments
Relevancy of judgments is addressed under
Sections 40 to 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, which deals with the relevance of previous judgments in legal proceedings. This topic is unrelated to the
Palvinder Kaur case.
