Correct option is D
The correct answer is (d) Article 39(b)
Explanation:
• On 5 November 2024, a 9-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled on the interpretation of Article 39(b) of the Constitution.
• The bench clarified that the government cannot acquire and redistribute all private properties under the pretext of them being "material resources of the community".
• Article 39(b) is part of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) and mandates the state to distribute ownership and control of material resources to subserve the common good.
• The judgment was delivered in the case Property Owners Association v. State of Maharashtra.
• The court ruled (8:1 majority) that a blanket acquisition of private property cannot be justified solely under Article 39(b). Each case must be considered contextually and proportionately.
Information Booster:
• This ruling ensures a balance between individual property rights (now a constitutional legal right under Article 300A) and public welfare objectives.
• It prevents misuse of Article 39(b) by limiting arbitrary expropriation by the state.
Additional Knowledge:
Article 90(1) (Option a)
• Pertains to vacation and resignation of seats in the Rajya Sabha, not related to property rights or DPSPs.
Article 85(2) (Option b)
• Deals with prorogation and dissolution of Parliament sessions by the President, irrelevant to property acquisition.
Article 81(1)(a) (Option c)
• Concerns composition of the Lok Sabha and population-based representation, not resource distribution or property laws.