Correct option is B
Statement A: In the USA, secularism follows the principle of strict separation between the state and religion, where neither can interfere in each other's matters. This is enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the establishment of religion by the government and ensures freedom of religious practice.
Statement B: The Indian Constitution takes a different approach to secularism, where the state maintains an equidistant relationship with all religions and actively protects minority rights. This includes provisions such as Article 25 (freedom of religion) and Article 29 and 30 (protection of cultural and educational rights of minorities), ensuring religious groups are treated fairly and their rights are protected.
Statement C is incorrect because in India, while the state is secular, it does not maintain a strict separation from religion. The Indian state may intervene in religious matters, particularly to promote social reform (e.g., banning practices like untouchability or sati). In contrast, the USA adheres to a stricter separation of church and state.
Statement D is false, as it is the Indian state that has the ability to intervene in religious practices for reform, whereas in the USA, the state cannot interfere in religious matters.
Information Booster:
· Indian secularism involves a balanced approach where the state can intervene in religious matters to ensure social justice and protect the rights of various religious communities, unlike the USA model of complete separation.
· In India, secularism is more inclusive, as the state provides for the protection of minority rights and encourages religious reform when needed.
· The USA adheres to a more rigid form of secularism, where the state cannot establish a religion or intervene in religious affairs.
· Indian secularism is unique in its attempt to maintain religious harmony by recognizing and respecting all religions equally while allowing intervention for social welfare.
· Indian secularism is often described as positive secularism, where the state engages with religion to ensure equality and reform, unlike negative secularism in the USA, which involves strict separation.