Correct option is B
In the landmark case of NALSA v. Union of India (2014), the Supreme Court of India made the observation that "social morality also changes from age to age." This case was a significant judgment where the Court recognized transgender persons as the "third gender" and upheld their rights under the Constitution of India. The Court emphasized that the rights of individuals must not be dictated by the prevailing social morality, which evolves over time, and that the Constitution is meant to protect the rights of individuals, even if they go against the grain of societal norms.
Information Booster:
1. NALSA v. Union of India (2014): The case was a watershed moment for transgender rights in India, recognizing them as a third gender and affirming their fundamental rights.
2. Social Morality vs. Constitutional Morality: The judgment highlighted the distinction between social morality, which may be rooted in societal norms and prejudices, and constitutional morality, which is based on the principles of justice, equality, and human dignity.
3. Transgender Rights: The Court's ruling in this case led to the formulation of policies and laws aimed at protecting and empowering transgender individuals in India.
4. Right to Equality (Article 14): The judgment reinforced that transgender persons are entitled to equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by Article 14 of the Constitution.
5. Impact: The NALSA judgment paved the way for subsequent legal developments and advocacy efforts in the area of LGBTQ+ rights in India.
Additional Information:
· Constitutional Morality: Refers to adherence to the principles of the Constitution, particularly with respect to individual rights and freedoms, regardless of prevailing societal norms.
· Evolving Social Norms: The judgment recognizes that laws and constitutional interpretations must evolve with changing social norms to ensure justice and equality for all individuals.
