Correct option is B
The Supreme Court of India emphasized that "Ownership is pre-eminently a right" in the case of B. Gangadhar vs. B.C. Rajalingam. This case revolves around the issue of ownership rights concerning immovable property. The court highlighted the inherent significance of ownership as a legal right, which is protected under the law. The judgment clarifies that ownership is not merely a bundle of rights but is pre-eminently a right, distinguishing it from other forms of property interests, such as possessory rights.
Information Booster
In the B. Gangadhar vs. B.C. Rajalingam case, the Supreme Court discussed the distinction between ownership and possession. While possession may give rise to certain rights, ownership is considered a more comprehensive and dominant right, including the right to transfer, use, and enjoy the property. The court underscored that ownership, as a legal concept, should not be undermined or confused with mere possession. The decision reiterated that ownership is a superior right that cannot be easily displaced by claims such as adverse possession unless all legal requirements are strictly met.
Additional Knowledge
· (a) P.T. Municchikkanna Reddy vs. Revamma: This case primarily dealt with adverse possession and the principles surrounding it. Although it discusses ownership in the context of adverse possession, it did not specifically emphasize ownership as "pre-eminently a right." The focus was more on the limitations and conditions under which adverse possession can be claimed.
· (c) Bishamber Dayal Chandra Mohan vs. State of U.P.: This case is related to the powers of the state versus individual rights. It does not deal with the specific issue of ownership rights and does not contain the quoted phrase about ownership.
· (d) None of the above: This option is incorrect because the correct case where the Supreme Court emphasized that "Ownership is pre-eminently a right" is B. Gangadhar vs. B.C. Rajalingam.
