In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement: One who has faith in God doesn't commit sin. Ram has faith in God.
Conclusion:
i) Ram doesn't commit sin
ii) One who doesn't commit sin will have faith in God

Choose the appropriate one from the following options

(A) Only conclusion i follows
(B) Only conclusion il follows
(C) Either i or il follows
(D) Neither i nor ii follows and
(E) Both i and il follow.

Correct option is A

Only conclusion (i) logically follows because the statement directly links having faith in God to not committing sin, and confirms Ram has that faith, meaning he doesn't sin; conclusion (ii) is a converse statement (If no sin, then faith) that isn't guaranteed by the original statement (If faith, then no sin), making (A) the correct option