In this question, a statement is given followed by four conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically.
Statement:
Rome was not built in a day.
Conclusions:
I. The Romans were lazy, they could not work in time.
II. It took about twelve years to build Rome.
III. The Romans did not have sophisticated equipment and infrastructure to build a city like Rome.
IV. It took years of patience, hard work and determination to construct a city like Rome.

Correct option is A

The statement "Rome was not built in a day" implies that constructing something significant requires time, effort, and patience. Let's evaluate each conclusion:

Analysis of Conclusions:

1. Conclusion I: The Romans were lazy, they could not work in time.

   • This conclusion is baseless and not implied by the statement. The delay in building Rome is not attributed to laziness but the complexity of the task.
   • Does not follow.

2. Conclusion II: It took about twelve years to build Rome.

   • The statement does not specify any particular timeframe. It simply emphasizes that building Rome required more than a day, symbolizing a prolonged effort.
   • Does not follow.

3. Conclusion III: The Romans did not have sophisticated equipment and infrastructure to build a city like Rome.

   • The statement does not provide any evidence about the tools or infrastructure used by the Romans. It focuses on the effort and time required rather than technological limitations.
   • Does not follow.

4. Conclusion IV: It took years of patience, hard work, and determination to construct a city like Rome.

   • This conclusion logically aligns with the metaphorical meaning of the statement, highlighting the prolonged and dedicated effort involved in achieving something great.
   • Follows.

Correct Answer: A. Only conclusion IV follows.