In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All W are C.
II. Some P are W.
Conclusion:
I. Some C are P.
II. No P is C.
III. Some C are W.

Correct option is B

Given Statements
I. All W are C.
II. Some P are W.
Conclusion I: Some C are P.
Since P has some overlap with W and W is fully contained within C, the P that overlap with W will also overlap with C. Thus, it follows that some C must be P. This conclusion is correct.
Conclusion II: No P is C.
Based on the statements, some P are W and all W are C, which implies that the P that overlap with W must also be C. Therefore it is incorrect to say that no P is C; in fact, some P must be C Conclusion II: No P is C. This conclusion is incorrect.
Conclusion III: Some C are W.
Since all W are C, this directly implies that all W are also C. Therefore, it is also true that some C must be W because W is a subset of C. This conclusion is correct.
Explanation:

Conclusion:
I. True
II. False
III. True
Hence, option (b) is correct answer.