In State of UP v/s M/S Lalta Prasad Vaish case in October 2024, a nine-judgeconstitution bench of the Supreme Court held which of the following decisions by 8 : 1majority? 

Correct option is C

• Judicial Clarification: The Supreme Court's decision addressed ambiguities in the legislative powers between the Union and states concerning alcohol regulation, especially distinguishing between potable and industrial alcohol.

• Legislative Competence: The Court emphasized that states have the authority to legislate on industrial alcohol unless explicitly overridden by Union legislation, thus preserving the federal structure of governance.

• Economic Implications: This ruling has significant economic implications, as it allows states to effectively regulate and generate revenue from industrial alcohol, a substantial source of income.

• Overruling Precedents: The judgment revisited and overruled previous decisions that limited state powers, providing a more nuanced understanding of constitutional provisions related to alcohol regulation.

• Majority vs. Dissent: While eight judges concurred on the states' powers, one judge dissented, highlighting the complexity of interpreting constitutional provisions regarding state and Union jurisdictions.