Correct option is B
The case of
Hadley vs Baxendale established the rule that damages for breach of contract should compensate for losses that were foreseeable or in the contemplation of both parties at the time of contract formation.
Information Booster:
Hadley vs Baxendale is the leading case on
consequential damages in contract law, setting a standard for what constitutes recoverable damages.
Additional Information:
·
Option (a):
Hyde vs Wrench deals with Counter-offers.
·
Option (c):
Scarf vs Jodine does not relate to contract damages.
·
Option (d):
Carlil vs Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. deals with unilateral contracts.
