arrow
arrow
arrow
In Bhanumati v. State of U.P. (2010), the Supreme Court, in interpreting Article 243C of the Constitution, applied the -
Question

In Bhanumati v. State of U.P. (2010), the Supreme Court, in interpreting Article 243C of the Constitution, applied the -

A.

Doctrine of Colourable legislation

B.

Doctrine of Silence

C.

Doctrine of Pith and Substance

D.

Doctrine of Basic features

Correct option is B


In Bhanumati v. State of U.P. (2010), the Supreme Court applied the Doctrine of Silence, which allows courts to interpret constitutional provisions in cases where the Constitution does not explicitly address a specific issue. The doctrine was applied in the interpretation of Article 243C, which concerns the composition of Panchayats.
Information Booster:
The Doctrine of Silence refers to judicial interpretation in areas where the law or Constitution is silent, leaving room for judicial interpretation based on other principles of law. This doctrine helps the courts address ambiguities or gaps in the legal framework.
Additional Knowledge:
· Doctrine of Colourable Legislation: Used when a law appears to be within the legislature's competence but in substance, it violates the Constitution.
· Doctrine of Pith and Substance: Focuses on the true nature of the legislation when determining its constitutionality.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow