Given below are two statements:
Statement I: Alexander Wendt has identified three types of anarchies in the international system.
Statement II: Alexander Wendt is an Idealist thinker.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

Statement I is correct. Alexander Wendt, a leading scholar in the field of International Relations (IR), is best known for his contributions to constructivism. In his work, "Anarchy is What States Make of It", Wendt identifies three types of anarchies in the international system based on different relationships between states: Hobbesian (enemies), Lockean (rivals), and Kantian (friends). These categories describe how states perceive and interact with each other within the international anarchic structure.
Statement II is false. Alexander Wendt is not typically classified as an Idealist thinker. Instead, he is a Constructivist, a theory that focuses on the importance of ideas, norms, and identities in international relations. Constructivism argues that the international system is socially constructed, meaning that states' behavior is shaped by their identities and perceptions, rather than being driven solely by material factors like power or military strength, as in Realism.
Information Booster:
1. Hobbesian Anarchy: States view each other as enemies, leading to a hostile international environment where survival is the main concern.
2. Lockean Anarchy: States see each other as rivals or competitors, but with mutual recognition of sovereignty and some degree of cooperation.
3. Kantian Anarchy: States consider each other as friends and partners, promoting cooperation, peace, and collective security.
4. Wendt’s work focuses on how state interactions and identities evolve over time, reshaping the nature of anarchy.
5. Constructivism emphasizes that the meanings assigned to anarchy are socially constructed through state behavior, interaction, and identities.
6. Unlike Idealists, Constructivists argue that while ideas matter, they are shaped by social structures and state interactions, rather than simply by a utopian desire for peace