Correct option is A
The correct answer is (a) Madhu Kishwar v. Union of India
Explanation:
• In the case of Madhu Kishwar & Ors v. State of Bihar & Ors (1996), the Supreme Court dealt with the constitutional validity of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908.
• The Act restricted succession to property in favour of male heirs only, effectively denying tribal women their inheritance rights.
• The petitioners argued that this custom violated the Right to Equality (Article 14) and the Right to Life (Article 21).
• The Court held that tribal women have a right to livelihood and that the exclusionary customs should be interpreted in a way that provides them security.
• While the court did not strike down the entire customary law, it mandated that female heirs be allowed to continue in possession of the land.
Information Booster:
• This judgment was a significant step toward recognizing gender equality within traditional tribal customary laws.
Additional Knowledge:
Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (Option b)
• This case (1999) challenged the law that recognized only the father as the natural guardian; the court ruled that both parents are equal guardians.
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (Option d)
• This case (1995) dealt with the issue of bigamy and conversion to Islam for the sake of a second marriage, highlighting the need for a Uniform Civil Code.

