Correct option is B
Post-modernist historiography challenges several conventional norms of historical writing. It often questions the objectivity, linearity, and fixed interpretations of historical events.
1. Sources which reflect the past are always written from somebody else's point of view: Post-modernism recognizes that all sources are written from a particular perspective, influenced by the biases and ideologies of the author. This aligns with post-modernist thought, which emphasizes the subjective nature of historical narratives.
2. Causation and chronology are essential for history writing: This statement is not true for post-modernism. While traditional historiography values causation and chronology as essential components of history writing, post-modernism challenges the necessity of these concepts. Post-modernists argue that causation and chronology are constructs that limit the interpretation of history and are not essential for understanding the past. They question the idea that history must be written with a cause-and-effect structure or follow a chronological order.
3. The idea of sequential time may be abandoned in writing of history: Post-modernists often reject the idea of a linear, chronological sequence in history. They argue that history can be understood in fragmented, non-linear ways. This aligns with the post-modern approach, which challenges traditional structures like sequential time.
4. Historical sources do not have fixed and unalterable meaning: Post-modernism asserts that historical sources are open to multiple interpretations, and their meaning can shift depending on the context in which they are read. The meaning of sources is not fixed, and this fluidity is a key characteristic of post-modern historiography.