The chronological order is:
(2) Royal British Bank v. Turquand → (1) Ashbury Rly Carriage Co. Ltd. v. Riche → (5) Salomon v. Salomon Co. Ltd. → (3) Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose → (4) State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. CTO, Vishakhapatnam.
English
10 Questions
20 Marks
12 Mins English English50 Questions100 Marks60 Mins English English10 Questions20 Marks12 Mins English| (A) Fisher v Bell |
[i] Privity of contract |
| (B) Harvey v Facey |
[ii] Minor contract is void |
| (C) Mohiri Bibi v Dharmodas Ghosh |
[iii] Invitation to treat |
| (D) Dunlop Tyre v Selfridge & Co. |
[iv] Quotation of prices |
A valid contract can be entered into between parties under the Indian Contract Act. Which of the following gives legal recognition to such a contract?
(A) Section 10-A of Information Technology Act
(B) Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act
(C) Section 1(4) of Information Technology Act
(D) Section 63 of Indian Evidence Act
Choose the correct option:
Suggested Test Series
Suggested Test Series
| (A) Fisher v Bell |
[i] Privity of contract |
| (B) Harvey v Facey |
[ii] Minor contract is void |
| (C) Mohiri Bibi v Dharmodas Ghosh |
[iii] Invitation to treat |
| (D) Dunlop Tyre v Selfridge & Co. |
[iv] Quotation of prices |
A valid contract can be entered into between parties under the Indian Contract Act. Which of the following gives legal recognition to such a contract?
(A) Section 10-A of Information Technology Act
(B) Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act
(C) Section 1(4) of Information Technology Act
(D) Section 63 of Indian Evidence Act
Choose the correct option:
