​A statement is given followed by two arguments I and II. Read the statement and the arguments carefully and select the appropriate answer from the given options.

Statement:

More and more agricultural land should be sold for housing and industrialisation.

Arguments:

I. Severe food shortage will be unavoidable if conversion of agricultural land into industrial land does not stop soon.

II. It has been proven that industrialisation in an area destroys its ecosystem and biodiversity.

Statement Analysis: The statement suggests that agricultural land should be sold for housing and industrialization. This implies prioritizing development over agriculture.

Argument I: "Severe food shortage will be unavoidable if conversion of agricultural land into industrial land does not stop soon."

This highlights the negative impact of selling agricultural land, i.e., the potential for food scarcity.

Impact on the statement: It weakens the statement by emphasizing the essential need to retain agricultural land for food production.

Argument II: "It has been proven that industrialisation in an area destroys its ecosystem and biodiversity."

This argument highlights the environmental damage caused by industrialization.

Impact on the statement: It weakens the statement by pointing out the ecological risks of converting agricultural land for industrial use.

Both arguments oppose the idea of selling agricultural land for housing and industrialization, thereby weakening the statement.

Hence, the correct answer is B.