The following question gives a sentence that has been divided into five parts which might not be in their correct order of narrative. The sentence is then followed by five options, one of which gives the sequence of the rearranged parts to make the sentence meaningful. Choose the option which gives the correct sequence of the parts. If the sentence is already arranged in the correct sequence, then mark option "No rearrangement required" as the correct answer.

(A) mistook them for enemies
(B) windmills that dot the fields in
(C) the villages appeared like
(D) from a high vantage point, the
(E) soldiers, causing travelers who

Correct option is C

The correct sequence is DBCEA, and here’s the breakdown:
1. (D) "From a high vantage point, the" - This is the logical opening as it sets the perspective.
2. (B) "windmills that dot the fields in" - Connects naturally by introducing what is seen from the vantage point.
3. (C) "the villages appeared like" - Follows by describing the appearance of the windmills.
4. (E) "soldiers, causing travelers who" - Adds a cause-effect relationship, explaining the confusion.
5. (A) "mistook them for enemies" - Concludes with the outcome of this confusion.
The final sentence:
"From a high vantage point, the windmills that dot the fields in the villages appeared like soldiers, causing travelers who mistook them for enemies."
This sequence maintains a logical flow from observation to perception and reaction, creating a clear and vivid image.