arrow
arrow
arrow
'A' cuts down a tree on B's land with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of B's possession without B's consent. A has committed
Question

'A' cuts down a tree on B's land with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of B's possession without B's consent. A has committed

A.

No offence until the tree is taken away

B.

The offence of criminal misappropriation of property

C.

The offence of criminal breach of trust

D.

The offence of theft

Correct option is D


The correct answer is (d) The offence of theft. According to Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.), theft involves dishonestly moving a movable property out of someone else's possession without their consent. Explanation 1 and 2 of Section 378 clarify that when someone cuts down a tree (which is initially immovable property) with the intention of moving it (thus making it movable), and doing so dishonestly, it constitutes theft.
· Explanation under Section 378 I.P.C.:
· Explanation 1: A thing attached to the earth, like a tree, becomes movable property as soon as it is severed. If someone cuts down a tree intending to take it away without the owner’s consent, it amounts to theft.
· Explanation 2: If the intention to dishonestly take the tree existed at the time of cutting it down, the act is considered theft even before the tree is moved from the spot.
Information Booster:
1. Theft Definition: Under Section 378, theft is the dishonest moving of movable property out of someone else’s possession without their consent.
2. Movable vs. Immovable Property: Trees are considered immovable property when attached to the earth, but they become movable upon being cut down.
3. Intention: The key element in theft is the dishonest intention. 'A' had this intention when he cut down the tree, which makes the act theft.
4. Possession and Consent: Theft requires that the property be in someone else's possession and that the removal occurs without consent.
5. Criminal Misappropriation vs. Theft: Criminal misappropriation involves dishonestly appropriating property after coming into possession of it, while theft involves taking property out of someone’s possession.
Additional Information:
· Explanation 1 & 2 of Section 378 I.P.C. (d): These explanations make it clear that even though the tree is immovable when attached to the ground, the act of cutting it down with the intent to move it and take it away without consent constitutes theft.
· Criminal Misappropriation (b): This would apply if 'A' had come into possession of the tree legally but then decided to keep it dishonestly. Here, 'A' did not have legal possession initially.
· Criminal Breach of Trust (c): Involves misappropriation after entrustment of property, which does not apply in this case.

Similar Questions